Saturday, October 11, 2008

The Magic Number is Actually 8.12% per Year

Brett Steenbarger at Traderfeed referenced an interesting chart of the S&P 500 showing a 10% drift pattern. Brett writes:

Henry Carstens has posted an interesting chart that captures a 10% "drift channel" in stock market prices that reflects the long-term growth rate in equities as identified by the Dimson et al research. What is apparent from the chart is how far above that trend line we have risen in recent years. Henry opines that this unusual rise is attributable to the introduction of high leverage into markets via investment banks and hedge funds. With the credit crunch, we're seeing a massive unwinding of this leverage, which is returning us toward the "fair value" represented by the drift channel. Should we overshoot this channel to the downside, that might constitute a measure of longer-term investment opportunity.

I have been watching the same trend and actually included an earlier version of the following in my upcoming book, Running with Herd:

My monthly data goes back to 1939 and shows an 8.12% long-term growth rate (before dividends) in the S&P 500 Index over the past nearly 70 years. A band of 44% above and below the regression mean bounds the Index throughout the period and contains the Bull Market of the 1950-60's, the secular Bear Market of the 1970's and the Bull Market of the early 1990's (except for the tech bubble leading up to Y2K). Interestingly, all the Bull and Bear Markets prior to the Tech Bubble, grew at either the upper, lower or midpoint at the 8.12% rate.

Here's what I all this means for us today? The good news is that after last week's collapse, the Index came within 6% of the bottom boundary (intra-day 839 low vs. 789) boundary); we should be near very the bottom. The bad news is that projecting forward to the end of 2009, the lower boundary increases to only 858, or still below Friday's close.

There will be bounces but, in all likelihood, it will be a long time (several years) before the Index touches 1400 again. Unfortunately, the "buy-and-holders" are going to feel extremely frustrated. Market timing will be extremely important. You'll have to trade gingerly taking advantage of recovery moves. You'll have to be patient and not expect a robust Bull Market to return anytime soon. Shed poor performing stocks and, as market weakness appears, become defensive to conserve your capital.

Labels: , ,

5 Comments:

At 8:30 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your March 1 2008 call was correct.

 
At 12:47 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Everyone talks about all of the money on the sidelines - any chance of an 87 type recovery?

 
At 6:09 AM, Blogger Guru said...

Thanks for reminding me about that March 1 posting. After rereading it, I'd call it was prescient if I don't say so myself. Chalk it up to an equal portion of luck, though.

As far as an '87 form of correction, you should know that it took 21 months for the market to reach the pre-crash high. How did the MTI (Market Timing Indicator) fair. It gave an all-clear signal 12 months later, after the market had crawled back 25% into the full recovery.

That would be after the Index had crawled back during the current crash to approximately the 1050-1250 area through 2009. The exact point will depend ultimately on when and where the true bottom is actually reached and the speed of the recovery.

 
At 10:48 AM, Blogger New York Investing meetup said...

The 2002 closing bottom for the S&P 500 was 777, which is a few points off of your bottom channel line. So that looks like a good place for a market bounce. But what is the channel was violated on the downside as much as it was on the upside. What would the bottom for the S&P, Dow and Nasdaq be under that scenario?
Organizer, New York Investing meetup

 
At 11:25 AM, Blogger Guru said...

Interesting question, excellent point ... and dire consequences. The 2000 peak exceeded the upper boundary by 37%.

If the Index were to overshoot the lower boundary by an equal percentage (to 73% of the the current value of 789) then the bottom would be somewhere around 575-620 depending on when it actually took place (10/08-12/09).

Let's hope it doesn't overshoot but, as you point out, an overshoot in one direction often/usually overshoots in the opposite direction on the correction.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home